About the Library Instruction Case Wiki: Difference between revisions

From Library Instruction Case Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 23: Line 23:
We encourage you to take and use the case studies available on this site in your own library instruction efforts. Feel free to adapt them to your needs and to the resources available to you, and to share them with others (see [https://lib.byu.edu/casewiki/index.php/Terms_of_Use_and_Copyright terms of use]).
We encourage you to take and use the case studies available on this site in your own library instruction efforts. Feel free to adapt them to your needs and to the resources available to you, and to share them with others (see [https://lib.byu.edu/casewiki/index.php/Terms_of_Use_and_Copyright terms of use]).


We also hope that you will develop your own case studies and choose to post them here so that others can benefit from your work. Learn [How to Contribute Cases].
We also hope that you will develop your own case studies and choose to post them here so that others can benefit from your work. Learn [[How to Contribute Cases]].


Whether or not you contribute your own cases, we want to hear from you. Email us your stories, or make comments using the discussion tab at the top of every page on this site.
Whether or not you contribute your own cases, we want to hear from you. Email us your stories, or make comments using the discussion tab at the top of every page on this site.

Revision as of 15:51, 24 March 2009

Mission

The purpose of the Library Instruction Case Wiki is to promote and facilitate the application of case method teaching in library and information literacy instruction.

Teaching with cases is widespread in legal, business, and medical fields, and has been shown to increase both learning and enthusiasm in students. Case teaching is a problem-based approach to active learning, concepts that are increasing prominent in the library field. (See the Annotated Bibliography for further reading.)

Although case teaching is more effective, it also requires more preparation on the part of the instructor. By making cases we have developed for instruction available on this site we hope more librarians will be encouraged to experiment with the case method. We also hope to encourage discussion and research on the topic of case teaching.


Origins

Andy Spackman and Leticia Camacho began experimenting with case teaching at Brigham Young University's Marriott School of Management in September 2007. Without a physical presence in the business school we spend much of our effort on outreach, for which library instruction has proven most effective. By 2007 we were conducting over 120 instructional sessions per year, with over 3,000 participants. These sessions were primarily integrated into specific courses, including a mandatory session in the communications class required of all business school students. And yet students continued to express a need for additional opportunities for formal library instruction in specific topics. To meet this need we launched a series of extracurricular, open-door clinics modeled after the clinics at The Home Depot stores. (See a schedule of recent clinics here.)

These "Business Research Clinics" have been a success, with 637 students and faculty attending 48 clinics during the first two years. Our approach evolves as we learn more about promoting library instruction where attendance is voluntary, and based on early student feedback we began to use cases in our teaching. The case method is familiar to business students who commonly encounter it in their regular coursework. Adapting this pedagogical model to library instruction has made us much more effective in connecting with our students and faculty and makes principles of information literacy more relevant to them.

Attendee satisfaction ratings for clinic content average almost 5% higher for clinics taught using the case method, and an independent samples t-test shows that this increase is statistically significant at a 95% confidence level. Anecdotal evidence has also been encouraging, with both students and faculty specifically commenting on the value added by the case method. We continue to research the impact of case teaching and will add citations for our findings as they are published.

For further discussion of the origin and implementation of the Business Research Clinics and the introduction of case teaching, see Andy Spackman and Leticia Camacho, "Integrated, Embedded, and Case-Based: Selling Library Instruction to the Business School," in Librarian as Architect: Planning, Building and Renewing: Thirty-Sixth National LOEX Library Instruction Conference Proceedings, edited by Brad Sietz, Susann deVries, Sarah Fabian, Suzanne Gray, & Robert Stevens (forthcoming from Ypsilanti, MI: LOEX Press, 2009). You can view the slides from the associated presentation here.


How You Can Become Involved

We encourage you to take and use the case studies available on this site in your own library instruction efforts. Feel free to adapt them to your needs and to the resources available to you, and to share them with others (see terms of use).

We also hope that you will develop your own case studies and choose to post them here so that others can benefit from your work. Learn How to Contribute Cases.

Whether or not you contribute your own cases, we want to hear from you. Email us your stories, or make comments using the discussion tab at the top of every page on this site.